November 23-30, 2012
Nov 25 01:35 Alida Messinger's monopoly, Part I Nov 25 01:39 Alida Messinger's monopoly, Part II Nov 23 09:36 Greta takes the gloves off, bloodies Obama administration Nov 23 13:19 Showing up and staying Nov 26 12:55 Tom Ricks, progressive propagandist/spinmeister Nov 27 05:00 Inside the DFL's $40 billion budget Nov 27 09:57 DFL doing fiction: What's new? Nov 30 04:36 Will DFL overhaul MnSCU?
Prior Months: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Prior Years: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Alida Messinger's monopoly, Part I
If ever there was a post that exposed the Leftosphere as unserious stenographers of pro-Alida fluff, this post fits that description. The title says everything about the unseriousness of the post:
One-party rule doesn't guarantee unity on issues of environment and energy
A DFL governor and DFL legislature don't guarantee Alida getting her way on all things anti-industry. Alida waving a big stick over the heads of DFL freshmen in swing districts is what guarantees unity on energy and the environment policy. What Alida wants, Alida gets. More accurately, what Alida demands, Alida gets.
In the last legislative session where Democrats controlled both houses and also held the governorship, as they will again this January, Morse was finishing his first Senate term as a DFLer from the Winona area. It was the 1989-1990 biennium and such fixtures of the contemporary scene as the Minnesota Environmental Partnership, the legislative coordinating council he now heads, weren't yet invented.
Three sessions later, for the 1995-1996 biennium, Tuma joined the Legislature as a Republican member of the House from Northfield. Remarkably, in hindsight from these more rigid, immoderate times, having lost a bid for the Democrats' nomination two years earlier didn't disqualify him from winning both the Republican nomination and then the seat itself in 1994.
Today he lobbies for Conservation Minnesota, known back then as the state chapter of the League of Conservation Voters (and, incidentally, writes quite engagingly about Minnesota political history on his blog).
It isn't a stretch to call Tuma a 'Carlson Republican.' Today, he's a lobbyist against the mining industry. He's Alida's kind of 'Republican' in that he's a lobbyist against the mining industry.
I wrote in this post about Conservation Minnesota's agenda:
Conservation Minnesota, Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness and the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy are targeting the proposed PolyMet mine near Hoyt Lakes and the proposed Twin Metals mine near Ely.
That means Mr. Tuma is an anti-mining lobbyist. He's lobbying for an organization with Ms. Messinger as the Vice-President of their Board of Directors.
Let's stop briefly to connect the dots.
First, Alida Messinger is the boss in the DFL. After the 2010 elections, she said that she wouldn't write another $500,000 check to the DFL if Brian Melendez was still the chair. Days later, he announce he wasn't running for another term. Shortly thereafter, Ken Martin was installed as DFL chair. Next, Ms. Messinger is the major funder of ABM, the pro-DFL smear campaign messaging machine. Finally, she's on Conservation Minnesota's board of directors, which dictates to the DFL which environmental policies they'll support.
If you think it's pure coincidence that Ms. Messinger 'owns' these things, think again. It's something that runs in the Rockefeller family :
Standard Oil gradually gained almost complete control of oil refining and marketing in the United States through horizontal integration. In the kerosene industry, Standard Oil replaced the old distribution system with its own vertical system. It supplied kerosene by tank cars that brought the fuel to local markets and tank wagons then delivered to retail customers, thus bypassing the existing network of wholesale jobbers. Despite improving the quality and availability of kerosene products while greatly reducing their cost to the public (the price of kerosene dropped by nearly 80% over the life of the company), Standard Oil's business practices created intense controversy. Standard's most potent weapons against competitors were underselling, differential pricing, and secret transportation rebates. The firm was attacked by journalists and politicians throughout its existence, in part for these monopolistic methods, giving momentum to the anti-trust movement.
Standard Oil was started by John D. Rockefeller, Ms. Messinger's great grandfather. While John D. Rockefeller created a monopoly in the oil industry, Ms. Messinger has created a political monopoly. She owns the DFL, their messaging machine and their most favored special interest group.
This is just the tip of Alida Messinger's monopoly. Check back later for Part II of Alida Messinger's monopoly.
Tags: Monopolies , Rockefellers , Alida Messinger , Conservation Minnesota , John Tuma , Lobbyist , Steve Morse , Minnesota Environmental Partnership , ABM , Unemployment , Twin Cities , Elitists , DFL
Posted Sunday, November 25, 2012 1:35 AM
No comments.
Alida Messinger's monopoly, Part II
When Speaker-in-Waiting Thissen named Rep. Hortman as the chair of the Energy Committee , he caved to another facet of Alida Messinger's monopoly. Rep. Hortman no longer represents her district. She's Alida Messinger's
Thinking people can't believe that the woman that essentially owns the DFL and funds their special interest allies, coupled with a DFL governor and a DFL legislature, isn't going to push her anti-jobs, anti-freedom agenda.
As I pointed out in this post , building monopolies is part of her DNA.
It's amusing to see the Leftosphere rush to this lawmaker or another to see what their legislative agenda will be. While they're the public face of the DFL, their thoughts are only important in terms of tactics.
Alida Messinger dictates the agenda.
If Alida said that PolyMet investors would be frustrated another 2 years, Rep. Thissen and Sen. Bakk will sign off on Alida's decision. If Alida said that Minnesota needs a cap and trade program, which she will, swing district DFL legislators will fall on their swords and make it a reality. If Alida said small business owners aren't paying enough in taxes, the DFL will dutifully pass the tax increase and Gov. Dayton will cheerfully sign it. If Alida dictated a change in the sales tax to include taxing clothing and groceries, the DFL legislature will pass it. Gov. Dayton will sign it with a big smile on his face.
It's important that we understand what these things mean in human terms becasuse that's what's most important.
Cap and Trade will cause electric bills to " n ecessarily skyrocket ." That isn't just my prediction. It's a direct quote from then-Sen. Obama. When electric bills in Minnesota "necessarily skyrocket," Minnesotans should think of it as the DFL's squeezing the life out of Minnesota's middle class. Make no mistake about it. This is a regressive tax, the type the DFL usually rails against.
Is that the Minnesota you want to live in?
When PolyMet investors give up on their project, mining jobs won't be created. The gap in median household income between St. Louis County and the state average will widen. In 2010, the median household income in St. Louis County was $44,941. The statewide average was $57,243. Sen. Bakk, who is from Range country, will dutifully vote to kill the Twin Metals and PolyMet projects.
Don't miners deserve a chance at prosperity?
When the DFL legislature and Gov. Dayton raise taxes on small business owners will cut jobs, contribute less to their employees' health care and 401(k) plans and scrap plans to expand. Dynamic job creation will stop. That's a prediction based on past history. It's as predictable as the sun setting in the west.
It's inevitable that the DFL legislature will pass and DFL Gov. Dayton will sign sales tax 'reform' into law. That means everyone buying groceries and clothes will spend hundreds of dollars more each year in sales tax. How many middle class families can afford that? The working poor can't afford that. That won't matter to the DFL because they're getting hit with that whether they like it or not.
Families should think of the hundreds of dollars they spend on sales tax for groceries and clothes as the DFL's 'gift' to their family budget.
When jobs aren't created and employees pay more of their health insurance costs, they can't thank Alida Messinger for their employer robbing Peter to pay Paul to cover the cost of Alida's expensive tax increase.
It's important for people to understand that we'll all pay dearly for what Alida wants. This isn't about economic growth. Economic growth won't happen under Alida's rule. Alida's agenda is progressive social policy masquerading as economic policy.
Finally, the DFL budget will be in the $38,000,000,000-$41,000,000,000 range. They'll attempt to pay off their political allies with their budget. The dirty little secret is that the revenues from their tax increases won't materialize.
When Maryland passed a millionaire's tax, they collected less money because millionaires moved to northern Virginia. When the French socialists said that they'd tax billionaires at a rate of 75%, those billionaires moved to England.
Does Alida think small business owners will stay and pay hundreds of millions of dollars in extra taxes when the economy is booming in North Dakota?
The simple truth is that Alida Messinger's monopoly will hurt Minnesota families in a variety of ways. Between the higher electric bills (thanks to Alida's cap and trade bill) to more money spent on clothes and groceries (thanks to Alida's sales tax increase), Minnesota's middle class families will be hit hardest.
Remember this: What Alida wants will cost you bigtime.
Tags: Tax Increases , Sales Tax , Income Tax , Cap And Trade , Alida Messinger , Mark Dayton , Tom Bakk , Paul Thissen , Melissa Hortman , Middle Class Squeez , Deficits , Unemployment , Monopoly , DFL
Posted Sunday, November 25, 2012 6:59 AM
Comment 1 by Chad Q at 25-Nov-12 09:02 AM
And even if everything you have predicted comes true, the DFL fatihful in this state will vote in favor of their party maintaining a strangle hold on the state no matter how much damage they do. I mean there are enough rich people and businesses in this state to pick up the slack and foot the bill for all the tax increases, right? The ends justify the means for these people and they don't care if the state economy is ruined.
Comment 2 by Jethro at 25-Nov-12 09:59 AM
"When Maryland passed a millionaire's tax, they collected less money because millionaires moved to northern Virginia. When the French socialists said that they'd tax billionaires at a rate of 75%, those billionaires moved to England."
This is not that hard to understand. Tax the rich mantra is getting old yet? Not paying their "fair share" huh? When the rich leave the state, they take their money with them. Case closed. How is that for being fair? Too bad Messinger & Dayton don't understand this simple fact.
Comment 3 by Gary Gross at 25-Nov-12 10:35 AM
Gov. Dayton doesn't understand this. Either that or he isn't admitting it. In January, 2011, he said that the Minnesotans he knew were too good to not pay that extra tax.
Comment 4 by walter hanson at 25-Nov-12 11:26 AM
Gary:
I hate to say this, but I think your budget number is very low. After all the DFL got $36 billion out of the balanced budget the republicans passed. You're looking at a $5 billion increase minimumu so you're looking at a budget from $41 billion plus.
Of course the public will then ask why did I vote those spenders in.
The only reason why we can't teach the lesson on the federal level right now is that the Federal Reserve keeps printing money for Obama so he doesn't have to deal with any of the mess he is creating.
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Response 4.1 by Gary Gross at 25-Nov-12 01:33 PM
Please get your figures straight, Walter. The budget passed was $34.5 billion.
Comment 5 by Nick at 25-Nov-12 01:36 PM
Hey everyone, remember when MN's cigarette tax increased? It didn't raise the revenue that it was supposed to. The cigarette tax increase was supposed to bring in an extra $174 million per year, but only brought in an extra $4 million per year.
http://reason.com/archives/2011/07/08/minnesotas-tax-failure-warning
Response 5.1 by Gary Gross at 25-Nov-12 04:39 PM
The moral of Nick's story is that you're never guaranteed the projected revenue from a tax increase. You'll always get the savings from budget cuts. And there's lots of waste in the state budget, starting with K-12 & higher education. There's too many administrators that shouldn't have their jobs.
Comment 6 by Nick at 25-Nov-12 01:45 PM
http://reason.com/archives/2010/01/13/who-wants-to-tax-a-millionaire
Comment 7 by eric z at 25-Nov-12 08:20 PM
Give it up. Go back to beating up on Nancy Pelosi.
That, or just let go of the entire gender gap rap.
Comment 8 by eric z at 25-Nov-12 08:23 PM
So, who exactly in the GOP controlled two State houses last term was it that projected gambling income would pay for Wilfare? There were fellow-travelers on both parties; but the majority was GOP, and they shoveled it on heavy about how gambling would be manna from heaven.
I suppose that was Alida Messinger's fault, right?
Give it up.
Comment 9 by Gary Gross at 25-Nov-12 09:19 PM
I wrote a number of articles about the funding of the Vikings Stadium. The plan was Sen. Bakk's. But that's ok with you because he's a DFL legislator, right?
Comment 10 by walter hanson at 26-Nov-12 04:29 PM
Gary:
Keep in mind I came up with $36 billion because of the bonding bill which was $500 million plus which shouldn't have been done in 2011, the education shift, and the bonds on the tobacco sale. That made spending what I remembered as $36 billion.
Considering that they will do a bonding bill (which they consider free spending) of over a billion dollars it's safe to say that the number $41 billion for spending is going to be beaten quite easily.
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Comment 11 by walter hanson at 26-Nov-12 04:33 PM
Eric:
That was governor Dayton's baby and he was willing to agree to anything because he thought that was free jobs. A lot of Republicans voted against it.
I guess that means Governor Dayton can't count on your vote for reelection.
As for beat up on Nancy Pelosi keep in mind unlike state wide elections where the large minority cities can be used to win senate elections or give Obama the state it isn't enough to convince a majority to vote the Republicans out. After all they had over 60 seats to defend and the democrats gained just ten states despite all of that great Obama turnout.
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Comment 12 by eric Z at 26-Nov-12 05:12 PM
Walter - Dayton's pushing the stadium to passage, but not pushing to tax the rich does say something, doesn't it. I agree it is galling.
But God, Walter, think of what it would be if Emmer had been elected. Unless/until you present palatable candidates, e.g., Ron Paul over vulture-voucher, you cannot criticize voters for opting for the lesser evil. Dayton's performance is not unlike Obama compromising on health care and not pushing card check as he promised.
Deceits, yes, but the problem is I believed Paul Ryan entirely, and it made my hair stand on end. He is as batshit crazy as Michele Bachmann, just less of an exhibitionist at being so.
Oil patch war mongerers and ill schooled austerity mongerers; give me a break. And, Walter, in Minnesota it was less love of Obama that carried the day than fear of vulture-voucher and dislike of the distasteful amendments attacking equal rights and right to vote.
You folks with those jackass stupid amendments ...
Comment 13 by eric Z at 26-Nov-12 05:15 PM
Walter. Do be inclusive. Blame Ted Mondale for his fair share of scorn, please. And he WAS Dayton's choice, no doubt about that. The low point in the Dayton administration. But it would not have happened without the Republican votes. And not without the GOP abandonment of the party's platform plank against expanded gambling in Minnesota. It was bipartisan betrayal, no doubt, no claim otherwise.
As George Carlin taught, it is all one big club, and we're not in it.
Comment 14 by walter hanson at 26-Nov-12 08:50 PM
Erio:
Keep in mind you were attacking the Republican House and the Senate for the stadium bill. It was governor Dayton's bill because he wanted it. And if you want to blame Mondale remember Dayton gave us Mondale. So attack Dayton not the republicans for that! Oh I forgot if you can't attack Republicans you can't type anything.
About those so called stupid amendments. One was specifically needed because it had to be in the constitution because it was meant to stop judges from over turning it. The other one became a constitutional amendment because Governor Dayton not only didn't want to do his job and work out a fair bill he went out and lied about it (oh I forgot you're a democrat who doesn't care when a democrat lies). Mark Ritchie didn't want to do his job and went out and lied about it!
I think the reason why you hate Ryan and Bachmann so much is because they have the nerve to say something is a problem and we need real action (something that Obama doesn't want to do and apparently you don't want).
As for Obama compromising on health care where is tort reform? Where is letting somebody buy a policy in any state? Where is reducing the number of mandates in the policies so a person can get what they want like they can with their auto insurance? Why do catholics and other people who believe abortion is wrong have to pay for abortion coverage and things which promote sex outside of marriage (remember that executive order he signed to con House members like Oberstarr to get their votes because the Senate took out the antiabortion language)? OBAMA DIDN'T COMPROMISE! Oh I forgot you want the federal government running 100% on health care so anything less is a horrible compromise.
I thought you said the election was over so why rehash 2010 let alone 2012?
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Greta takes the gloves off, bloodies Obama administration
Greta van Susteren is pissed at the Obama administration. That isn't the daintiest way of putting it but it's what's called for. I could say that she's upset with this administration. I might've said she thinks they're playing games. I won't say that because that's pussyfooting around what Greta thinks. In Greta's opinion, it's time to take the gloves off and blister this amateurish, corrupt administration. She did that in this post :
The Obama Administration is playing dirty. Trying to put a price tag on access - either a news organization plays ball and accepts what they dish out without challenge, or the news organization is excluded, punished. Check this out:
Fox News has been aggressively reporting on Benghazi because it is newsworthy when 4 Americans are MURDERED and because it was obvious the Obama Administration was telling 'silly stories' that didnt' make sense and were not supported by the facts. The Administration's Benghazi story got more curious when the Administration sent out Ambassador Susan Rice to sell the silly stories on 5 news shows. Two months later, the American people still don't have the straight story. It is our job to get the facts. We are trying.
The Obama Administration has done everything but give us the straight story and they are fighting us on getting the facts.
And why do I say the Obama Administration should grow up? Because the Obama Administration is trying to punish Fox for trying to get the facts from the Administration (do I need to remind anyone that 4 Americans were murdered?) The Administration in what looks like a coordinated effort is denying Fox to information that they are handing out to other news organizations. Why exclude Fox? That is simple: to punish, to try to teach us a lesson not to pry, not to look further for facts.
This isn't just Greta's opinion, though it's fair to say this is what she believes. Top flight attorneys know that opinions don't stand up at trial if they aren't supported by evidence. Greta is a top flight attorney who knows when to stick the dagger in. That's what she did with this information:
Here is my proof. The Administration is now 3 out of 3:
1. The State Department called a media conference call the night before its employees testified on Capitol Hill and OMITTED FOX FROM THE CALL; (they claimed it was an accidental oversight);
2. About 2 weeks after the above State Department conference call to all in the media, the CIA had a media wide briefing and released their timeline. The CIA invited major news organizations to the briefing but THE CIA EXCLUDED FOX FROM THOSE INVITED TO THE BRIEFING.
3. and now the latest: DNI Director James Clapper told Capitol Hill last week that the DNI did not know who took the term Al Qaeda out of the talking points that was given to Ambassador Susan Rice. It turns out that is not true and the DNI released a memo to the media last night indicating that DNI Director James Clapper was wrong last week when he said that (incidentally two plus months after the murders.) The [DNI/CIA] removed Al Qaeda from the talking points memo given to Ambassador Susan Rice. But that's not all; it isn't just the 'who is on first' at the DNI, it is also what the DNI did to Fox last night. The DNI LEFT FOX NEWS CHANNEL OFF ITS DISTRIBUTION LIST last night when it released this new memo to the media.
Only idiots from Media Matters or Huffington Post will be stupid enough to argue with Greta about this. Not even Paul Begala is stupid enough to question Greta about this information or Greta's opinions.
This is a vindictive administration. They've repeatedly said on national TV that they intend on making an example of FNC. First, here's a golden oldie from David Axelrod:
White House senior adviser David Axelrod said Sunday that the Fox News Channel is "not really a news station" and that much of the programming is "not really news."
"I'm not concerned," Axelrod said on ABC's "This Week" when George Stephanopoulos asked about the back-and-forth between the White House and Fox News.
"Mr. [Rupert] Murdoch has a talent for making money, and I understand that their programming is geared toward making money. The only argument [White House communications director] Anita [Dunn] was making is that they're not really a news station if you watch even; it's not just their commentators, but a lot of their news programming.
"It's really not news; it's pushing a point of view. And the bigger thing is that other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way, and we're not going to treat them that way. We're going to appear on their shows. We're going to participate but understanding that they represent a point of view.'
It's the height of stupidity to say that Bret Baier, Catherine Herridge, Jennifer Griffin, Ed Henry and Jim Angle aren't great reporters. They've broken stories that've put this administration in a difficult position.
Contrary to this administration's belief, it isn't the media's job to hide their mistakes and divert the public's attention from their mistakes. And Benghazi was far greater than a mistake. It's a continuing national tragedy. It's a full-fledged scandal. It's a failure of this administration's top national security officials.
Had this happened during the Bush administration, the compliant liberal media would've called for the firings of the Bush administration's national security team. Frankly, they would've been justified had Bush's national security team been this incompetent.
Hillary said no to Christopher Stevens' pleas for additional security. Leon Panetta fiddled while Christopher Stevens was assassinated. Susan Rice said an obscure video sparked protests outside the Benghazi consulate when she knew there wasn't a protest outside the consulate. Finally, the DNI scrubbed the mention of Ansar al-Shariah from the briefing document Ambassador Rice supposedly relied on.
Simply put, this bunch of incompetents and yes men/women did what they were told, including punishing a news organization for attempting to report the truth:
We at Fox are not simply accepting what they say, what they dish out. We are looking for facts and corroboration when there are inconsistencies and discrepancies. To the extent we get anything wrong is because the Administration is doing whatever it can to thwart us from getting the facts.
They are trying to punish us into going away, hoping we get their message that we will never have access to them as long as we dare to challenge what they put out. And guess what? What they have put out and what we have challenged shows they are cagey and not giving the straight story.
This won't end well for the Obama administration. This will be Obama's Watergate, Obama's Iran-Contra. On steroids. The difference is that people didn't die during the Watergate burglary or the Iran-Contra negotiations. Four American patriots died as a result of President Obama's and Hillary's mishandling of the Benghazi terrorist attack.
Tags: President Obama , Hillary , Leon Panetta , Susan Rice , James Clapper , National Security , Benghazi , Nixon's Black List , Terrorist Attack , Democrats , Greta van Susteren , Investigation , Catherine Herridge , Jennifer Griffin , Reporting , Scoops , Fox News Channel
Posted Friday, November 23, 2012 9:36 AM
Comment 1 by eric z at 24-Nov-12 10:10 AM
FOX excluded.
So?
Showing up and staying
The first workshop I attended at this summer's RightOnline Conference was about reaching out to minority communities. It was titled "Preaching Beyond the Choir: Growing the Ranks of the Free Market Movement," which I wrote about in this article . The first featured speaker was Anita MonCrief. Here's what Ms. MonCrief said that jumped out at me:
She said that the biggest mistake conservatives make is not fighting in every minority district. Part of that, she said, is understandable, acknowledging the fact that "people won't trust us at first." Ms. Moncrief said that it's important to continue the efforts so that people find out that they're since, not just out for their votes.
Another major point in Ms. Moncrief's presentation was saying that "If we want to take America back, it has to be block-by-block. She said there's no substitute for being there, staying committed and building relationships."
Ms. Moncrief said that listening is essential. That means starting conversations rather than talking to people. Ms. Moncrief said that she enjoyed "talking to the people in their neighborhoods." She said it doesn't take a big budget to do that. It just takes effort.
That afternoon, I had the privilege of sitting down with Ms. MonCrief for a lengthy conversation about outreach programs. She's a bright, articulate, quick-on-her-feet, no-nonsense lady. Most importantly, she knows what she's talking about when she says that listening is essential to successful outreach efforts. She's also right in saying "there's no substitute for being there, staying committed and building relationships."
The reason for highlighting those things now is because Kim Strassel's article talks directly about what's wrong with the GOP election model:
Even with higher GOP turnout in key states, even with Mr. Obama shedding voters, Democrats still won. Mr. Obama accomplished this by tapping new minority voters in numbers that beat even Mr. Romney's better turnout.
In Florida, 238,000 more Hispanics voted than in 2008, and Mr. Obama got 60% of Hispanic voters. His total margin of victory in Florida was 78,000 votes, so that demographic alone won it for him. Or consider Ohio, where Mr. Romney won independents by 10 points. The lead mattered little, though, given that black turnout increased by 178,000 votes, and the president won 96% of the black vote. Mr. Obama's margin of victory there was 103,000.
This is the demographic argument that is getting so much attention, and properly so. The Republican Party can hope that a future Democratic candidate won't equal Mr. Obama's magnetism for minority voters. But the GOP would do far better by fighting aggressively for a piece of the minority electorate.
There's no question that capitalism will lift minority families out of poverty. Similarly, there's no question that that message won't resonate if conservatives don't devote tons of hours reaching out to every demographic group. PS- Progressive trust fund babies and elitists aren't demographic groups.
Mitch Berg, one of the conservatives who gets it, has written eloquently about how the GOP can fight on the topics of charter schools and vouchers to win minority votes. Dan Severson has spent tons of hours doing outreach to various minority communities.
The point is that it's time for conservatives to put together a well-funded outreach program. If we don't do that on a national scale, presidential elections will become a night of misery for Republicans.
Conservatives aren't victims so they shouldn't spend time whining about what should or shouldn't have happened. Conservatives are, by nature, solution-oriented opportunists. That's why we're entrepreneurial by nature.
Conservatives would win overwhelmingly if we fought as hard for every vote in every demographic group as we fight against tax increases.
Hispanics are pro-life, hard-working people. They're a natural fit with conservatives. Churchgoing, middle class black families are a better fit with conservatives than with the Obama coalition. Why didn't we do better with them? Here's why:
Republicans right now are fretting about Mr. Romney's failures and the party's immigration platform - that's fair enough. But equally important has been the party's mind-boggling failure to institute a competitive Hispanic ground game. The GOP doesn't campaign in those communities, doesn't register voters there, doesn't knock on doors. So while pre-election polling showed that Hispanics were worried about Obama policies, in the end the only campaign that these voters heard from - by email, at their door, on the phone - was the president's.
Two cliches fit this situation perfectly. They are: People don't care how much you know until they know how much you care and You can't beat something with nothing.
Right now, minority communities don't know conservatives want them to live a life of prosperity because we aren't there day after day telling them that. We aren't there day after day earning their trust or building relationships.
That's essential in building an appealing something that will defeat the Democrats' unappealing pandering.
There's an important message to the activists. The DC establishment hasn't built this outreach program so it's up to us. Let's start building ASAP.
Tags: GOTV , Mitt Romney , GOP Establishment , Activists , AFP , RightOnline , Anita MonCrief , Charter Schools , School Choice , Prosperity , Entrepreneurship , Battleground States , GOP , Conservatism , Elections
Posted Friday, November 23, 2012 1:19 PM
Comment 1 by Chad Q at 24-Nov-12 08:31 AM
While I tend to agree that the GOP needs to educate the voters, I don't think there is enough money to overcome the free "education" the democrats get from the media and the school system. And no matter how much the people say it isn't the reason Romney or the GOP in the state lost, it is really hard to vote against Santa when he/they are promising more and more free stuff when they tax the rich. These people don't care because they have no dog in the fight and they will continue to vote for those who will give to them instead of take away, no matter how screwed up that thinking is.
Comment 2 by Gary Gross at 24-Nov-12 08:36 AM
Chad, the "free education" that the media gives the DFL is difficult, but not impossible, to overcome. Showing up & staying is the only way it's possible but it is quite possible.
Comment 3 by eric z at 24-Nov-12 10:07 AM
Where is the conference held? Where is Moncrief from?
Is she a local person, or brought in on parade?
It seems to me she should be reaching out to her own home community instead of giving speeches to a bunch who already buy into "the market paradigm dream," "free" to the highest bidder. Moncrief gave her dog-pony speech for how big an honorium I don't know; but is this somebody with a booking agent on a speaking circuit arranged via a speakers' bureau; or is Moncrief grassroots instead of astroturf?
Detail. Only detail.
Don't let detail get in the way of messaging. That worked so well with the Romney-Ryan economic plan that there is no cause to abandon it in speechifying post-election?
Comment 4 by Gary Gross at 24-Nov-12 12:26 PM
First, Alida Messinger is a secretive person. That's what Baird Helgeson wrote in the Strib in Oct., 2011:
For more than 30 years, one of the most influential charitable and political donors in Minnesota has been a woman passionate about issues but guarded about her privacy.By comparison, Anita MonCrief has openly told people about her experiences as an ACORN community organizer. She's told people about ACORN's voter fraud rackets, too.
That alone makes Ms. MonCrief infinitely more transparent than Ms. Messinger.
Next, Ms. MonCrief isn't working for the RNC or other GOP organization. She's working for grassroots organizations. She's light years ahead of the GOP establishment.
Finally & most importantly, Ms. Messinger has funded some of the most intellectually dishonest smear campaigns in Minnesota history. She's a disgusting, vile aristocrat who insists on getting her way.
It's interesting, Eric, that you've hated on capitalism but you've ignored Ms. Messinger's building a political monopoly now that it fits your beliefs.
Whatever happened to the vitriol you spewed about the Koch Brothers? Is it only evil in your eyes when the rich people are expressing conservative thoughts?
Isn't that the definition of being a hypocrit?
Comment 5 by walter hanson at 25-Nov-12 11:23 AM
Eric:
So since you agree with Ms. Messinger you don't care about the damage she is doing to this state let alone this country.
Just what free goodies does the state of Minnesota give you that you like so much?
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Tom Ricks, progressive propagandist/spinmeister
This video of Tom Ricks' interview with FNC's Jon Scott shows off his infantile logic:
This statement is outrageous:
I think Benghazi was hyped, especially by this network. Now that the campaign is over, [Sen. McCain's] backing away from his previous statements.
When Scott asked how it's possible to hype the killing of 4 American patriots, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Ricks asked if Scott knew how many security contractors were killed in Iraq.
That type of infantile logic is typical of progressive thinking. First, Chris Crocker, the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq during the Bush administration, didn't request additional troops to protect the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. Similarly, he didn't request additional troops for any of the U.S. consulates in Iraq.
Next, these security contractors know that they're being hired to be the front line of defense against terrorists and militias. While there's no question ambassadors in some nations have a dangerous job, they aren't expected to be the front line of defense against RPG-armed, well-trained terrorists and militias.
Another key distinction that's worth noting is that the Bush administration didn't attempt to hide the fact that security contractors had a dangerous job. They didn't manufacture stories about a non-existent mob got out of control, then killed a U.S. ambassador. They didn't send out someone who didn't know what had happened and wasn't accountable for what happened to explain what happened.
Furthermore, during the second presidential debate, President Obama said that he'd called the terrorist attack on Benghazi a terrorist attack from the outset, then went to the UN and repeatedly apologized for a video that nobody had seen.
President Obama's clear intent was to hide the fact that his administration's inaction led directly to the deaths of 4 American patriots. If Mr. Ricks is suggesting that the needless killing of 4 American patriots isn't a big thing, then I'd love debating him about that.
Finally, no progressive diatribe would be complete without them accusing FNC of being a campaign instrument of the GOP. Here's the obligatory FNC is the GOP's lacky statement:
I think the emphasis on Benghazi has been extremely political, partly because Fox is operating as the wing of Republican Party.
It's apparent that Mr. Ricks is an operative for the progressive movement. He doesn't think for himself. His logic is infantile. He's willing to overlook the possibility that this administration is willing to say anything to hide their incompetence. He's willing to say things that hide the fact that this administration's decisions led directly to the unnecessary deaths of true American patriots.
That's the responsibility of progressive spinmeisters.
Tags: Tom Ricks , Spin , Benghazi , Terrorist Attack , President Obama , Cover-up , Christopher Stevens , Libya , Ambassador , Susan Rice , Hillary Clinton , National Security , Democrats
Posted Monday, November 26, 2012 12:55 PM
Comment 1 by eric Z at 26-Nov-12 05:21 PM
What's this "true American Patriots?" Until it is clear whether or not CIA detentions/torture was happening, hold off on the "patriot" language.
I was not there, I have an open mind, I await facts, and I believe in FOX as much as I believe in the Easter Bunny. Ruppert runs nothing short of a pure propaganda mill.
He'd have a better show if he just had Ollie North and Sarah Palin arm wrestle.
Comment 2 by Gary Gross at 26-Nov-12 06:29 PM
Eric, if you'd like peddling the notion that Christopher Stevens & 2 Navy SEALS aren't American patriots, I'd just ask you sell that at the local VFW or American Legion hall.
I'd suggest that you wear a flack jacket if you attempt to peddle that tripe.
FACT: There were military assets less than an hour away in Italy.
FACT: The State Department was talking with Christopher Stevens during the early part of the attack. We know this because Fox News correspondent Catherine Herridge got the emails verifying that & because State Department official Charlene Lamb testified to that during a House committee hearing. (Feel free to argue that Ms. Lamb perjured herself in her testimony if you're that certain.)
FACT: Christopher Stevens, Ty Woods, Glen Doherty & Sean Smith really died needlessly that day in Benghazi.
FACT: Documents uncovered by CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkison show Christopher Stevens' repeated requests for more security in Benghazi.
FACT: Documents discovered by Fox News Correspondent Catherine Herridge show that a special meeting was called in the State Department on the specific subject of the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi.
QUESTION: Isn't that a lot of facts discovered by "a pure propaganda mill?"
Finally, your hatred of Fox & anything remotely related to conservatism have prevented you from maintaining an open mind.
Comment 3 by eric z at 27-Nov-12 10:28 AM
Strib wrote it up.
http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/tv/180902391.html
Ricks said FOX was acting as a wing of the Republican Party; and FOX killed the interview.
The truth hurts I suppose.
So, what would Romney have done differently? FOX is silent about that. Curious.
Finally, the election result proves people have more faith in Obama than in FOX. Wisdom of the masses.
Comment 4 by Gary Gross at 27-Nov-12 11:04 AM
Personally, I'd rather that FNC humiliate Ricks but I'm ok with them flushing his trash down the drain. He clearly wasn't interested in having an intelligent discussion about the killing of 4 American patriots.
Ricks' goal was to be a mouthpiece for the anti-war left fringe. He, like you, is stupid enough to think that President Obama is worth defending, even when his decisions are indefensible.
As for your question about what Gov. Romney would've done, I won't address it because it's a distraction. What's relevant is that President Obama & Hillary Clinton knew about the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi, they knew about Christopher Stevens' pleas for additional security.
Despite that information, they ignored Christopher Stevens' pleas for additional security, which is why he & 3 other American patriots died needlessly.
Their blood is on President Obama's & Hillary Clinton's hands. That's the disgusting reality. That's why they should be run out of DC.
That's why they'll be recorded in history as the worst president & secretary of state in the modern era.
Comment 5 by Lady Logician at 27-Nov-12 08:44 PM
Hey Eric....hot tip for ya....MITT ROMNEY ISN'T PRESIDENT!!!! Your guy is and HE is the one that needs to held accountable....
LL
Comment 6 by Lady Logician at 28-Nov-12 07:53 AM
Your asking what Romney would have done differently is about as stupid and unserious as it would have been if Bush supporters would have asked his critics what John KERRY or Al GORE would have done differently.....
Quit trying to shift the responsibility. The buck stops with Obama - not Romney.
LL
Inside the DFL's $40 billion budget
The sticker shock of the DFL's 2014-15 biennial budget will be harsh and immediate. That's because it will likely top $40,000,000,000 for the first time in state history. The DFL's budget will include at least 2 tax increases. It will attempt to pay off all of the DFL's special interest allies with taxpayers' hard-earned money.
First, it's inevitable that the DFL's budget will raise taxes on "the rich" because, in their warped thinking, "the rich" aren't "paying their fair share." For at least a decade, the DFL has let that social policy masquerade as economic policy.
For at least as long, the DFL has said that Minnesota's tax system needs to be more progressive. Despite that long-espoused policy, the DFL's true believers will vote to change the sales tax to include clothing. The most charitable estimates for that change is that it will generate an additional $750,000,000 in revenue.
As for Gov. Dayton's income tax increase, it'll be fortunate to generate an additional $2,000,000,000 in revenue for the biennium. That's assuming that Gov. Dayton keeps the top tax bracket at 10.95% on couples making $130,000. That isn't a safe assumption. In 2011, the highest state tax rate was 11%, a figure Gov. Dayton didn't want to exceed.
Now California has raised the top tax rate to 13%, giving Gov. Dayton additional latitude. Being the tax-raising advocate that he is, he's certain to raise the top income tax bracket to more than 12%. He'll do it because he'll need the additional revenue.
While Gov. Dayton, Sen. Bakk and Rep. Thissen will pay down a bit of the K-12 school shift, the DFL won't pay much of it back. The lobbyists with the biggest smiles will be the ones who lobbied for making LGA whole again. R.T. Rybak and Chris Coleman will have tons of additional money to spend on $50,000 a piece drinking fountains. R.T. Rybak might even have enough money to hire back the firefighters he terminated when he kept the bike trail coordinator.
Higher Education figures to be another big winner, followed by taxpayer-funded charities. Inner cities will get boatloads of additional money. The DFL will 'justify' the spending as a way to reduce crime but it's actually money that will pay off the DFL's precinct organizers.
Higher Education funding shouldn't see a penny in additional spending until MnSCU stops hiring university presidents their cronies to high-paying administrative jobs. That's a massive ripoff to the taxpayers. What's worse is that it doesn't add a thing to the quality of educational outcomes.
Until Central Lakes Community College drops worthless programs like Floral Design, the state's taxpayers will be getting ripped off while students accumulate more student loan debt.
When it's all settled, the DFL budget will be a masterpiece in wasting taxpayers' money. Ultimately, spending will be cut because actual revenues will fall short of the DFL's projections. When the DFL's 'experiment' is implemented, it'll be clear that the DFL's ideas hurt businesses but they don't create jobs.
They just give big city DFL mayors big smiles.
Tags: Budget , Deficits , Tax Increases , Income Tax , Sales Tax , LGA , Pork , Mark Dayton , Tom Bakk , Paul Thissen , R.T. Rybak , Chris Coleman , Higher Education , Floral Design , DFL
Posted Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:00 AM
Comment 1 by Hi at 27-Nov-12 05:06 PM
Hi, nice article. Do you have any facts? Or is this just your thoughts? Or maybe it's a hybrid and your always right about everything. That would be pretty cool.
Comment 2 by Rex Newman at 29-Nov-12 05:04 PM
Somebody should make a chart of the tax and spending bills proposed by the DFL but vetoed and not overridden from Pawlenty's second term. That's 2007-2010. Add to that two years of Dayton's proposals, 2011-2012. Finally, apply their most sacred of cows baseline budgeting and see what the projected 2013 budget will be, certainly well above $40 billion.
Then we can sit back with a big bowl of popcorn and watch their special interests duke it out as they try to whittle to 39.99999 billion for appearances' sake. Like the Teamsters and Bakers at Hostess.
Comment 3 by walter hanson at 29-Nov-12 06:51 PM
Rex:
They will be just like Obama and think they have to go for $42 billion. Fortunately or should I say unfortunately, they can't print money and run deficits like Obama is doing.
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
DFL doing fiction: What's new?
One thing that's coming Minnesotans' way is a tax increase. I predicted here that we'd see an income tax increase on "the rich" as well as a sales tax increase because the DFL will pass legislation that starts taxing clothing sales. This article , though, says that a tax increase isn't a guarantee, even with the DFL running the legislature and a DFL governor. That's pure fiction and Ann Lenczewski knows it:
Gov. Mark Dayton is expected to launch the discussion in January when he unveils his plan for making the tax system fairer and simpler. But Dayton's long-promised income tax increase on top earners could be a tough sell, even with Democrats now in control of the House and Senate.
Tim Pugmire should know better. He should know that that's fiction. In 2006, Mike Hatch ran on an agenda of increasing spending without raising taxes. Here's what Hatch said then:
He cast Pawlenty as too stingy with education, responsible for large class sizes and rising college tuition. He tagged him for an inadequate response to soaring health care costs and the emerging biosciences industry. He promised more state investment in those things. Significantly, he said, 'we can do this without raising taxes.'
I didn't believe the DFL then. I don't believe the DFL now. The DFL has to pay to their political allies that contributed to their campaigns. The DFL's allies didn't do this out of the kindness of their heart. (First, it's impossible to think Eliot Seide has a heart.)
There are government agencies to restaff. More importantly, militant environmentalist organizations are demanding that the DFL beef up the MPCA and the EQB. It isn't just anyone demanding these things, either. It's Alida Messinger making these demands. As the majority owner of the DFL and ABM, their messaging machine, what she demands, she gets. And she's demanding that these environmental agencies get beefed up.
Next up to the trough will be mayors demanding that their LGA be made whole again. They'll be led by Duluth Mayor Ness, R.T. Rybak and Chris Coleman. And there are lots of mayors who will be insisting that their LGA be restored.
Frans said that almost everyone he talked to believes the tax code is out of date, and they are particularly concerned that property taxes are too high.
"As I've been taking the three-legged stool around to describe the three major sources of revenue, the property tax, the sales tax and income tax, people are concerned that the property tax leg now makes up about 40 percent of the three different major sources of revenue," Frans said. "They believe that's too much, and it's something we need to address."
Frans said a comprehensive approach to tax reform would also include a recalibration and broadening of the sales tax. In addition, he said, Dayton still wants every Minnesotan paying his or her fair share of income taxes. That proposal, which first surfaced in the 2010 campaign, would target the wealthiest 2 percent for an increase.
One reason why property taxes make up 40% of the revenues is because idiots like R.T. Rybak make terrible spending decisions, then pass the buck on through higher property taxes.
Another reason why is because Minnesota's economy isn't booming like it should. If we had a flourishing economy, like North Dakota's, income tax revenues would make up a bigger share of the revenues. Instead, our biggest employers are the university system, the federal government and state government.
That's way too much government to pay for -- except in the minds of Gov. Dayton, Alida Messinger, the DFL and their special interest allies.
Tags: Taxes , Tax Increases , Sales Tax , Income Tax , Spending , LGA , MPCA , EQB , Employee Unions , Eliot Seide , AFSCME Council 5 , R.T. Rybak , Drinking Fountains , Bike Trail Coordinator , Public Safety , Chris Coleman , Don Ness , DFL
Posted Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:57 AM
Comment 1 by Chad Q at 27-Nov-12 06:19 PM
Does this mean that those who currently pay nothing in state income tax and receive huge benefits, are actally going to pay for some of their freebies? I mean Dayton says he wants to make sure everyone is paying their fair share. Seems to me that those who pay nothing and receive free stuff aren't paying their fair share.
There are not enough "rich" people in this state to pay so we are all going to pay for the democrats spending binge, not just the rich.
Comment 2 by Nick at 27-Nov-12 09:36 PM
"Well, anytime someone says 'tax fairness,' that means increased taxes on everyone, and that's exactly what the proposal will be," said GOP Rep. Greg Davids of Preston
Couldn't agree more!!
Comment 3 by Bob J. at 28-Nov-12 09:34 AM
Want to raise taxes on everyone? That's exactly what a sales tax on clothing will do. Let everyone feel the heat of what they voted for.
Minnesotans are about to get the government they deserve. The role of the conservative for the next two years is to never let them forget what they voted for.
It will fail. Liberal economic policy always does.
Comment 4 by Jethro at 28-Nov-12 04:27 PM
Why is it the DFL does not like to talk about wasteful spending or government inefficiencies?
Comment 5 by walter hanson at 28-Nov-12 08:21 PM
Jethro:
They think that it isn't wasteful spending at all. Not to mention this story which happened in the 1990's highlights it.
I had just come to a meeting of a group I was a member of. There was a member of the Minneapolis school board there asking our organization to join others to support the levy tax increase to maintain small class sizes to improve education. The following conversation took place.
ME: So the average teacher salary is what $60,000?
SBM (school board member): First looks at her aide. The aide nods yes. That's right.
ME: And we spend an average of $10,000 per student now.
SBM: Looks at her aide again. The aide nods yes. That's right.
ME: Well if we're spending just $60,000 on the teacher and still have a $100,000 left that is being spent on other things instead of doing the tax increase shouldn't we spend the other money in the class room?
SBM: Very shocked look on her face and then gave a mumbled answered about the importance of education.
This levy by now which is always renewed by Minneapolis voters means that graduates from the 1990's should have brilliant education.
Do they?
Walter Hanson
Minneapolis, MN
Comment 6 by eric z. at 30-Nov-12 01:37 PM
Armchair administrators.
Five potential candidates commenting; Gary makes six.
If you believe you have better ideas test them with the electorate. File and run.
Will DFL overhaul MnSCU?
This St. Cloud Times article suggests there's a decent chance the DFL won't rubberstamp MnSCU's requested increase:
DFL legislators set to oversee Minnesota state colleges and universities says the school system's request for a boost in state funding may be unrealistic.
The legislator, Rep. Gene Pelowski, Jr., and his counterpart, Sen. Terri Bonoff, also urged caution in possible tuition increases at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, or MnSCU, the system that includes St. Cloud State University and St. Cloud Technical and Community College.
In a budget request to state lawmakers approved earlier this month, the MnSCU Board of Trustees asked for $97 million in additional state funding in the budget cycle that begins next summer. MnSCU leaders also proposed in the request to increase tuition by about 3 percent and to provide a wage and benefit increase of about 3 percent to MnSCU faculty and staff.
But Pelowski, DFL-Winona, says he's skeptical about the request. Pelowski was named chair of the House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee after DFLers reclaimed control of the chamber in the Nov. 6 elections.
The quote is a step in the right direction for those of us who think MnSCU is fast becoming a thing of the past. Still, it's a far cry from being a fait accompli.
MnSCU's lobbyists will pressure Sen. Bonoff and Rep. Pelowski. They're certain to get calls from MnSCU Chancellor Rosenstone and the university presidents, too.
Still, with spending certain to increase and with the University of Minnesota certain to ask for a major spending increase, MnSCU might be a candidate for a trimming in their request. Either way, SCSU is likely to get a significant trim. Their enrollment is down 4.5%.
The type of overhaul that's coming, though, won't happen until the higher ed bubble bursts, which I wrote about in this article . That day is coming, though. It's a matter of when, not if.
Tag: MnSCU , Budgets , Deficits , Fiscal Crisis , Gene Pelowski , Terry Bonoff , Mark Dayton , Lobbyists , DFL , Higher Ed Bubble
Posted Friday, November 30, 2012 1:32 PM
Comment 1 by Rex Newman at 30-Nov-12 10:26 PM
MnScu could and should be cut significantly in view of the obvious oversupply of post-secondary education in MN. Yes, that means closing a number of campuses no longer needed. It should also end "jobless" degree programs, like Gary's favorite: Eco-Tourism.
Comment 2 by Nick at 01-Dec-12 01:27 AM
Rex, I agree! The tuition and fees I pay to SCSU have gone up every single year I have been there and yet somehow the SCSU administration always wants to put up more buildings, even when they are not necessary (such as Coborn Plaza Apartments, which is where I lived the first year it was open). Speaking of the Coborn Plaza Apartments, they are not even full!! I don't understand how SCSU can construct new buildings rather than renovate existing ones. To skeptical eyes, it just doesn't make sense!
Comment 3 by Gary Gross at 01-Dec-12 05:10 AM
Nick, the Coborns Plaza project was possibly the worst financial decision they've made there in recent years, which is saying something.
Rex, the Ecotourism certificate has disappeared from CLCC's offerings. This year's dippy offering is Floral Design, which costs approximately $5,800 in tuition & student fees.
The reward is a job that pays an average of $9.88 an hour in the Duluth-Superior area.
Is that like hitting the Powerball jackpot or what? LOL
Comment 4 by Jethro at 01-Dec-12 12:05 PM
Floral design jobs in Duluth? Okay!! What about the demand for aviation workers in Duluth?
"Besides creating a total of about 225 well-paying, skilled jobs, AAR's new maintenance, repair and overhaul base servicing Air Canada's fleet of 89 Airbus A320 series jets is expected to boost the local aviation industry."
