May 29-30, 2014

May 29 06:26 The solution to the miners' blues
May 29 07:19 The tale of the tape, Secretary of State edition
May 29 13:17 Pelosi's intentional misdirection
May 29 18:32 Democrats demand Shinseki's termination

May 30 08:48 Shinseki Watch in final minutes? UPDATE: Shinseki resigns
May 30 19:09 Ortman gets unflattering press
May 30 19:55 How long will Ortman last?

Prior Months: Jan Feb Mar Apr

Prior Years: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013



The solution to the miners' blues


This week, I've spent a ton of time focusing on the DFL's hostility towards the Iron Range's problems. The truth is that a prominent part of the DFL is interested in preventing another mining project from starting. That's what's really behind the PEIS that Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, aka NEMW, asked the US Forest Service to put together.

As I wrote here , Becky Rom, the vice-chair of NEMW, lied about whether NEMW had requested the PEIS. Here's the proof that the Ely Echo cited:




Then, late Thursday a Freedom of Information Act request by Twin Metals-Minnesota was granted. Upon request, they shared those documents with us. If anyone would like a copy, just send us an email.



In the documents provided by the Bureau of Land Management was a letter asking for the PEIS. The agency requesting the PEIS? Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness. And who is the vice-chair of NEMW? Becky Rom.

We also have copies of emails sent by Rom outlining a meeting with the BLM where the agenda included: 'The BLM, together with the Forest Service, should undertake a programmatic environmental impact statement.'


I've written extensively about which DFL politicians have tried tiptoeing that tightrope. Every DFL politician elected to statewide office has tried tiptoeing the tightrope. One day, they're artificially supporting the miners. The next day (or next event), they're enthusiastically, albeit quietly, supporting environmental activists like Becky Rom and Alida Messinger.



Rom doesn't want another mining project to start. Enough, though, of the DFL's negativity. If I just wanted to write about the DFL's hostility towards mining, I'd need a staff of writers and tons more bandwidth.

There's a simple solution to the miners' crisis. And yes, it's a crisis. The solution is voting for Republicans. They're staunchly pro-mining. Better yet, they don't answer to dishonest environmental activists like Becky Rom and dishonest environmental philanthropists like Alida Messinger.

If elected to statewide offices, Republicans will fight for the PolyMet and Twin Metals-Minnesota mining projects. It's that simple. It's that uncomplicated because Republicans don't rely on campaign contributions from environmental activists like Becky Rom.

If the RPM wanted to run a clever campaign against the DFL, they could start a 'What have they done for the Range lately' campaign. Even when the DFL-filled Executive Council approves mining exploration leases, it's torture for them. It's like they'd rather have a root canal without anesthesia than voting to approve mining exploration leases.

It's been 9 years since the PolyMet permitting process started. In that time, PolyMet has spent more than $150,000,000 in their attempt to comply with Minnesota's stringent environmental regulations. They've shown that they're solid corporate citizens.

If Iron Range communities like Chisholm, Eveleth, Hibbing and Virginia vote for the candidates who will fight for these mining projects, it'll be a tough night for the DFL, from State Rep. David Dill to State Auditor Rebecca Otto to the DFL's Secretary of State candidate to Congressman Rick Nolan to Gov. Mark Dayton and Sen. Al Franken.



Posted Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:26 AM

No comments.


The tale of the tape, Secretary of State edition


You can tell that the GOP and DFL state conventions start tomorrow. Yesterday, within a span of 3 hours, I got emails from the Hillstrom campaign on the DFL side and the Severson campaign and the Howe campaign on the GOP side.

The Mariani email announced that "the DFL African American Caucus" announced "their endorsement of Debra Hilstrom for Minnesota Secretary of State." I take this to be an announcement to help her win the DFL endorsement to be the DFL's candidate for Secretary of State. It isn't the type of announcement that will help Rep. Hillstrom win a general election.

The Severson campaign's email announcement was essentially a video presentation. Rep. Severson talked about his history in the military, including the fact that he led a team of F-18's.

The Howe campaign's email laid out his message while also talking a little about his fundraising. Here's a graphic that the Howe campaign put together:








The Howe campaign's email talked about Sen. Howe's executive experience:




In addition, I am also the only candidate with executive experience in both the private sector as Chairman for the Sears Dealer Stores and public sector as a former Mayor of Red Wing...


before talking about dealing with election corruption:






In the last election cycle, I personally encountered Democrats violating the Minnesota Campaign Finance laws. Thirteen DFL Senate candidates were charged with violating campaign laws which prevents coordination between state parties and individual campaigns. The largest monetary violation of that law was by my opponent in Red Wing. Of the thirteen, eleven of them are now sitting Minnesota Senators that gave the DFL the majority in the Minnesota Senate, which in turn gave us the largest tax increase in the history of the State of Minnesota. All the DFL had to do was pay the board $100,000.00 as a settlement.


Then he proposed a solution to this crisis:






As your Secretary of State, I will fight for legislation for special elections and/or criminal charges to prevent parties and candidates from illegal activities. You shouldn't be able to cheat and keep your seat.


Rep. Hillstrom won't fight to prevent that type of corruption. She's a Democrat first. Being Minnesota's chief election officer is incidental.



Sen. Howe's solution is the right solution to this type of corruption. People who knowingly cheat, which is what the DFL did, shouldn't be able to profit from their illegal activities. If you'd told Alida Messinger that DFL control of the Senate would require illegal coordination between the candidate and the DFL plus a $100,000 fine, she likely would've written that check that minute.

It isn't that I think fundraising is the be-all, end-all. It's that I know you can't run a competitive statewide race on a shoestring budget.

The point is that the DFL won't hesitate in throwing the kitchen sink at the Republican candidate. That requires the Republican candidate have the fundraising ability to get his message out. At this point, there's only one candidate that fits that description.

His name is John Howe.



Posted Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:19 AM

No comments.


Pelosi's intentional misdirection


A few days ago, Nancy Pelosi spoke about the VA crisis in a dishonest way. Here's the video showing Ms. Pelosi's dishonesty:



Here's what she said that's infuriating:




Maybe when we go into war, we should be thinking about its consequences and its ramifications. You would think that would be a given. But maybe, it wasn't and so we go into a war in Iraq and Afghanistan and we leave Afghanistan for Iraq with unfinished business in Afghanistan. Ten years later, we have all these additional veterans.


This is the latest Democrat chanting point. Predictably, it's dishonest. Ed Morrissey's post highlights something Chairman Jeff Miller said in last night's hearing:




'Why have you not told this committee yet who was disciplined in Augusta, Georgia and Columbia, South Carolina, where nine veterans died because they were on a waiting list for colonoscopies?' [Rep. Jeff] Miller asked [Mooney].


The fact that 9 vets died while waiting for colonoscopies is telling. That's because a doctor wouldn't order a colonoscopy to diagnose whether a vet is suffering from PTSD. What makes sense of the colonoscopies is that it sounds like the type of test that veterans from the Vietnam War or Operation Desert Storm would receive once every 5-10 years because they're Baby Boomers.



Baby Boomers require more care as they age. According to Kim Strassel of the WSJ, the vast majority of the costs for VA hospitals is for treating Baby Boomers as they get to that age when they get treated more often.

It's apparent that Ms. Pelosi's diatribe was an attempt to deflect attention away from the VA system's failures by talking about Iraq and Afghanistan. That's intentional misdirection and it's shameful.

The truth is that Gen. Shinseki and his executive staff didn't pay attention to the problem. Ed's questions are the right questions:




What's missing? Accountability . There isn't one word of explanation about what Shinseki has done over the last five and a half years since taking over the Department of Veteran Affairs to prevent this kind of systemic fraud and widespread collapse, even after having his budget increased by 78% during his tenure by Congress. In the past six budget cycles, Shinseki has received $235 billion in extra funding over the FY2008 baseline for the VA budget. Where did the money go? What has Shinseki been doing for the past five-plus years? He writes this essay as if he'd just landed on the job, not as if he'd been in charge all along.


Call Shinseki's stunt the 'Obama Gambit' in honor of the man who's pretended that he's never been president.



This administration has been in charge for almost 6 years. They're still acting like they're going through the transition from the Bush administration. The cabinet posts have been filled for 5+ years but nobody's done a thing. Hillary didn't get urgent cables from the ambassador serving in a dangerous part of the world. President Obama didn't know about the IRS scandal until he read about it in the newspaper. Apparently, Gen. Shinseki didn't know about this VA crisis until the Phoenix whistleblower stepped to the microphone.

It's like a baseball manager filling out a lineup card, then not sending the players onto the field. This administration won't make decisions. They're more pontificators than administrators.

The VA crisis is the predictable outcome from an administration that specializes in talking, not doing.






Posted Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:17 PM

No comments.


Democrats demand Shinseki's termination


More Democrats are calling for Gen. Shinseki's resignation . Translation: Blah, blah...Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. We get it. Democrats are outraged, outraged I tell you, about the VA scandal.

Frankly, I don't care that they're expressing outrage, mostly because I'm thinking that it's faux outrage. I don't care that firing Gen. Shinseki won't fix the VA's problems, either, because that's missing the point. The VA was a disaster before Gen. Shinseki was confirmed as the VA secretary.

Gen. Shinseki must go because he's utterly incompetent. The situation got significantly worse during his watch. Gen. Shinseki has to go because he isn't capable of fixing the problem. Whether you're mad as hell or whether you're mildly upset about the VA Crisis (Yes, it's a crisis.) or whether you've barely noticed it, the point is that this crisis must get fixed ASAP. That's because it's immoral to let another vet die because of the government's corruption and incompetence.

George Will took a big step in solving the VA's crisis this past Sunday on Fox News Sunday:



Here's Will's complete response:




WILL: You solve that problem Republican in the following way. Kirsten says, look, Amtrak has trouble and so does U.S. Air. The difference is airlines, as a lot of them could tell you, go out of business. Amtrak is run by a government that prints money and therefore can never let Amtrak go out of business no matter how many billions it loses year after year after year. With the Republicans, it seems (ph), we should say is this -- this weekend, Memorial Day weekend, Americans are here and there on the interstate system. When the government decided to build that, that the country needed it, it didn't go into the highway building business. It didn't start a federal highway construction company.

It dealt with the private sector. And it got done. They can do the same thing with this. There's no reason in the world why, if I can use this word, it's anathema to Democrats, give people vouchers to be redeemed in our private hospital system.


Gen. Shinseki is a genuine military hero. Unfortunately, he was also utterly unqualified to run the VA Department. The remedy that Will suggested just wasn't used. It isn't that Gen. Shinseki didn't have the authority to send vets to private hospitals. He had that authority. He just didn't use it.



Thanks to the corruption within the VA system that's been exposed, I'd argue that it's time to utilize that option far more frequently.

Democrats were late to this crisis. Now that they're scrambling to look like they're finally interested, they're calling for Gen. Shinseki's resignation. They're right in that he needs to go. What's irritating is that these senators think calling for Gen. Shinseki's resignation will provide them with much-needed political cover. What's disgusting is that they aren't that interested in the solution.



Posted Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:32 PM

No comments.


Shinseki Watch in final minutes? UPDATE: Shinseki resigns


Gen. Shinseki has promised he'll start firing senior staff at the Phoenix VA Hospital :




Earlier Friday morning, Shinseki publicly apologized for the failures in the VA system, while stopping short of offering his resignation. However, responding to an interim inspector general report which found "systemic" problems with clinics lying about patient wait times, Shinseki said he would move to oust senior leaders at the Phoenix VA, where allegations of improper scheduling practices first surfaced.


Gen. Shinseki might not get the opportunity to fire those administrators at the Phoenix VA:






President Obama plans to meet with embattled Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki in the Oval Office on Friday morning, amid mounting calls for his resignation.



The two plan to meet at 10:15 a.m. ET. Obama, in an interview, said he plans to have a "serious conversation" with Shinseki about whether he can stay in his job.


It isn't a stretch to think we'll get word before 11:00 am ET that Gen. Shinseki has resigned his position and that President Obama has accepted the resignation with great sorrow.



The 'Shinseki Watch' appears to be in its final minutes.




Shinseki, speaking to advocates for homeless veterans, said he initially believed the problems were "limited and isolated." "I no longer believe that. It is systemic," Shinseki said. "I will not defend it, because it is indefensible."


What planet was Gen. Shinseki monitoring? He couldn't have paid attention to the VA hospitals because the evidence was abundant that the problem was widespread.



UPDATE: It's official. President Obama is announcing as I type that Gen. Shinseki has resigned. I'll have more as the information comes in.

Posted Friday, May 30, 2014 10:21 AM

Comment 1 by walter hanson at 30-May-14 02:07 PM
Gary:

Which thing should we more surprised about:

* The fact that he was driven to resign early (maybe with some pressure from President Obama)

Or that Obama didn't seem to care about the Obamacare website, people losing their insurance, and a couple of other issues to have a major meeting with Kathleen S which should've led to her to resign.

Walter Hanson

Minneapolis, MN

Response 1.1 by Gary Gross at 30-May-14 10:05 PM
Why pick between those options?

Comment 2 by walter hanson at 01-Jun-14 12:28 PM
Gary:

True, but given the problems with Obamacare were more serious than the VA and more well known you would've thought it would've gotten Obama to talk to Kathleen S and get her to take quicker action or resign sooner then how fast he talked to Shinseki and getting him to resign.

Walter Hanson

Minneapolis, MN


Ortman gets unflattering press


With the MnGOP State Convention underway and with the delegates voting on the US Senate seat, anti-Ortman people have sent out a flier that'll hit Sen. Ortman hard. Here's the flier:








That's gotta sting Sen. Ortman. Conventional wisdom said that she was the favorite for endorsement coming into this weekend's convention but she only got 22% of the delegates. That was only good for a third place finish for the first ballot.

With questions being asked if Sen. Ortman parked some delegates with other candidates, it isn't unreasonable to think that she might do better with the second ballot. This flier is a reminder to delegates that she isn't the "conservative champion" that Sarah Palin called her .

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Saying that the outcome isn't clear is understatement. Still, Sen. Ortman can't afford many more hits like she's sustained thus far.

Posted Friday, May 30, 2014 7:09 PM

Comment 1 by walter hanson at 01-Jun-14 12:23 PM
Gary:

I think you can tell how much damage her position on Obamacare had when you had less than one out of every four delegates wanting to vote for her. Sure her cap and trade might have counted for some votes, but it looks like three out of every four made up their mind not to vote for her because of it.

Walter Hanson

Minneapolis, MN

Response 1.1 by Gary Gross at 01-Jun-14 05:35 PM
Walter, I think Sen. Ortman's positions on the ACA & raising taxes just crippled her, with the full repeal on the ACA being the most damaging of the things.

I took lots of heat for writing about those things but it was the right thing to do. From my perspective, it's my affirmative responsiblity to inform people. When I find other things out about something I wrote about, I write another post about it. That's how I do things.

The bottom line is that the delegates decided she wasn't their first choice. Always trust the people.


How long will Ortman last?


The second ballot totals for the GOP endorsement for US Senate are just in and it isn't looking good for Julianne Ortman:



Sen. Ortman's support dropped by 2 points from the first ballot to the second. Did this flier have that much of an effect?





This certainly isn't what Team Ortman was expecting. It's one thing to be trailing after the first ballot. It's another to trail 2 candidates after the first ballot. It's quite another to be trailing those candidates after the second ballot. It's the ultimate slap in the face to be trailing those candidates after the second ballot and losing ground. This isn't the script Team Ortman had written.



To steal a Yogi Berra saying "It's still early but it's getting later than you think." I'd just ad that it's getting later faster than Team Ortman would like.

Originally posted Friday, May 30, 2014, revised 01-Jun 6:09 PM

Comment 1 by walter hanson at 01-Jun-14 12:25 PM
Gary:

I think not being given much praise here is what I think what finally got McFadden over the top is that he started running a campaign before the convention. Al Franken is already trying to respond.

Given that it looked like our candidate wasn't around trying to fight Amy K I think that is what got Mike over the finish line.

Walter Hanson

Minneapolis, MN

Popular posts from this blog

March 21-24, 2016

January 19-20, 2012

October 31, 2007