Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth

That's the sounds emanating from DNC chairman Howard Dean's office and from the nutters at DailyKos and Democratic Underground after hearing that Karl Rove won't be indicted in the Plame investigation. In the meantime, RNC chairman Ken Mehlman is demanding an apology from Dean and others for their "rush to judgement" about Rove. Fat chance that'll happen.
"We believe that the special counsel's decision should put an end to the baseless speculation about Mr. Rove's conduct," Rove attorney Robert Luskin said in a statement. "In deference to the pending case, we will not make any further public statements about the subject matter of the investigation." Fitzgerald's decision ends speculation into the investigation that started in 2004 that Bush could lose his longtime political aide if criminal charges came down against him.
You'd think that it would but Mrs. Wilson's attorney is already hinting about a civil suit. Talk about a politically-motivated vendetta. I can't say that it's surprising, though, considering how vindictive Mr. Wilson is. When dealing with people who willingly accuse the President of wrongdoing when they know the facts aren't on their side, it's hard to expect them to do the right thing.

UPDATE: Here's the Wilsons' attorney's statement:
We have become aware of the communication between Mr. Fitzgerald and Mr. Luskin concerning Karl Rove's status in the criminal investigation. We have no first-hand knowledge of the reason for the communication or what further developments in the criminal investigation it may signal. While it appears that Mr. Rove will not be called to answer in criminal court for his participation in the wrongful disclosure of Valerie Wilson's classified employment status at the CIA in retaliation against Joe Wilson for questioning the rationale for war in Iraq, that obviously does not end the matter. The day still may come when Mr. Rove and others are called to account in a court of law for their attacks on the Wilsons.
The only thing I've got to say after reading that threat is "Whatever."
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and other Democrats were quick to call for an investigation into the CIA leak and the connection to Rove, arguing that the controversy was just another reason for the president to clean house. "Good news for the White House, not so good news for America," Howard Dean, the Democratic Party chairman, said Tuesday in a cable television interview.
It's time for these whiners to sit down and shut up. This is proof that they don't believe in letting the facts speak for themselves, which isn't suprising considering how willing John Murtha is in ignoring the Constitution's guarantees of a fair trial and due process. In their mind, if a Republican, or someone in the military, is implicated in allegations of wrongdoing, then it's presumed that this person is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Shameful, huh?
"This is an enormous burden lifted off his shoulders. He always believed that he was totally innocent and that nothing would happen," former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich said of Rove. Gingrich added that Rove's situation shows that something is wrong with the current legal system. "There's something wrong when your entire life can be under this kind of threat for two full years, you spend lots and lots of money on lawyers, lots of time going to the grand jury and there's nothing there," Gingrich said.
There certainly is, Mr. Newt. There certainly is. And they're known as Democrats. We can find a cure for all kinds of cancer but they haven't found a cure for this specific type of cancer. We can all hope.


Posted Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:41 PM

May 2006 Posts

No comments.

Popular posts from this blog

March 21-24, 2016

Image
Mar 21 01:28 SCSU's budget cuts? Mar 21 02:29 When will the Range change? Mar 21 08:54 DFL's Marty in charge of environment Mar 21 11:45 OLA report, DFL & Meyer Associates Mar 23 12:48 Liberals' definition of moderate Mar 23 14:37 DFL activists: Government is racist Mar 24 08:59 IRRRB: Revamping vs. scrapping Prior Months: Jan Feb Prior Years: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 SCSU's budget cuts? Cuts in Athletics at SCSU - Will it Really Save Money? by Silence Dogood With a $6,000,000 "structural deficit" and the need to "rebuild reserves by at least $3 million," SCSU has a $9,000,000 hole in its' FY17 budget. It doesn't take a Noble Prize in economics to figure out that reductions in expenditures (i.e., cuts) are going to be made at SCSU. On the Wednesday before Spring Break, SCSU President Dr. Earl H. Potter sent an email to the campus community announcing cuts to the athlet
Read more

January 19-20, 2012

Image
Jan 19 02:57 Minnesota Majority report an indictment against Minnesota's election integrity Jan 19 03:41 Ron Paul's Logic Jan 19 08:08 Newt thrives despite Mitt's hatchet job efforts Jan 19 09:19 Potential Game-Changer: Perry dropping out this am Jan 20 05:12 Newt takes Sen. Santorum to proverbial woodshed Jan 20 00:56 ABC, CNN, crawl into bed with National Enquirer Jan 20 04:00 Child Care small businesses file federal lawsuit Jan 20 04:41 Mitt's biggest policy blunder Jan 20 18:58 Gingrich, Reagan re-united Prior Years: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Newt takes Sen. Santorum to proverbial woodshed Rick Santorum was really feeling it Thursday night. Then he said something that's certain to cause him pain this morning. Here's what he said that got him in trouble: SANTORUM: But you also have to admit that this freshman congressman who wasn't supposed to win a race came and did something you never did, which is blew the li
Read more

October 31, 2007

Oct 31 01:01 Media Matter's Alter Ego? Oct 31 03:32 Iraqi Civilian Casualties Dropping Oct 31 10:52 Hillary's Panderfest Blows Up in Her Face Oct 31 13:15 Brod, Emmer Call For Investigation of Mark Ritchie Oct 31 19:43 Ritchie's 'Episode' a Tempest in a Teapot? Prior Months: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Prior Years: 2006 Media Matter's Alter Ego? One Media Matters-like organization is already too many. It appears as though there's another liberal apologist blog out there. Their name is News Hounds . The post that caught my attention dealt with last weekend's interview of Justin and Darryl Sharraltt on Hannity's America. To say that their post didn't attempt to refute Justin's story is understatement. In fact, they jump right into criticizing Mr. Hannity: Last night's (October 27th) Hannity's America was a strange magazine format which combined stories about mediums and haunted houses
Read more