Judge Strikes Down NSA Program
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy.
A Jimmy Carter appointee has endangered us by ruling that the NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program is unconstitutional. Hopefully, the Bush administration will appeal this immediately to get this ruling struck down.
This judge has a history of interfering in established legal processes. Now she's said that we don't have the right to protect ourselve from people who've said that they want to kill us. Here's a display of her ethical challenges:
If that weren't so, they wouldn't have filed the suit there. Rest assured that this ruling won't stand. It will get overturned.
Posted Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:39 PM
July 2006 Posts
No comments.
A Jimmy Carter appointee has endangered us by ruling that the NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program is unconstitutional. Hopefully, the Bush administration will appeal this immediately to get this ruling struck down.
This judge has a history of interfering in established legal processes. Now she's said that we don't have the right to protect ourselve from people who've said that they want to kill us. Here's a display of her ethical challenges:
Chief Judge Anna Diggs Taylor of the federal District Court in Detroit tried to take the suit against the law school away from Judge Bernard Freedman, who had been assigned it through a blind draw, and who was suspected of being skeptical about affirmative action, and consolidate it with a similar suit against the university's undergraduate admissions practice, which Judge Patrick Duggan was hearing. The chief judge dropped that effort was dropped after the judge hearing the law school complaint went public with a blistering opinion objecting to what he termed "the highly irregular" effort of the chief judge. Judge Duggan ruled in favor of the undergraduate racial preferences, while Judge Freedman ruled against the law school preferences.It's obvious why the ACLU filed its lawsuit in this court. They must've known that she's a pacifist judge who doesn't take the GWOT seriously. They must've known that she's ultraliberal dipshit who thinks that hates President Bush. They must've known that she's to the left of Bernie Sanders. They must've known that she's a meddler predisposed to an ultraliberal ideology.
If that weren't so, they wouldn't have filed the suit there. Rest assured that this ruling won't stand. It will get overturned.
Posted Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:39 PM
July 2006 Posts
No comments.