Clark: U.S. Needs New Plan on Terror War

Gross: Dems Need A Credible Spokesperson on National Security

That's my conclusion after reading this AP article and I'm sticking with it. Gen. Clark has now gone from being a disgraced fired battlefield general to being a disgraceful political hack on the national security issue. Here's a disgraceful section of his diatribe:
"This administration has taken us on a path to nowhere, replete with hyped intelligence, macho slogans and an incredible failure to see the obvious," Clark said in the broadcast.
Obviously, Clark's ignoring the fact that California Conservative's Ray Robison has been doing a great job posting documents that show President Bush didn't hype the intelligence. To the contrary, Ray's work has shown that Saddam's generals thought they had WMD's and were shocked to find out that he didn't. So much for hyped intelligence.

But why should verified facts interrupt Gen. Clark's diatribe, right?

Furthermore, it's insulting for Gen. Clark to say that President Bush's plan is a "path to nowhere." Shame on his politically-motivated claims. He claims that President Bush's policies, which have led to the liberation of 50 million people and the writing of two constitutions, are leading us nowhere.

Only an idiot could say it and mean it. And Clark isn't an idiot. He's a willing accomplice in a mean-spirited, dishonest attack on a president who's taken a proactive approach to ridding this world of the villains who killed three thousand innocent civilians and who terrorized an entire region.

While President Bush has been bold, Democrats have been timid little-minded whiners who don't have a coherent strategy on winning the GWOT. They only have diatribes and trite-sounding 'goals' like capturing bin Laden.
Clark joined House and Senate Democrats on Wednesday in calling for a strategy that would provide U.S. agents with the resources to pursue bin Laden, redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq, better equipment for the military and improved screening of containers and inbound cargo.
Wednesday's strategy announcement came 'complete' with a 6 page outline (3 pages if you took out the Spanish-language translation) on how they planned to accomplish their goals.

What Democrats haven't figured out is that trotting out a general who doesn't provide details on how Democrats would do better is a waste of time to most Americans. Simply put, they don't care about the spokesperson's resume; they care about the policy.

Until Democrats can offer a serious, detailed plan on how to win the GWOT, they can trot out whichever general or military man they want and it won't make a difference. It's all about who's serious and who isn't.

Cross-posted at California Conservative

Posted Sunday, April 2, 2006 12:19 AM

No comments.

Popular posts from this blog

March 21-24, 2016

Image
Mar 21 01:28 SCSU's budget cuts? Mar 21 02:29 When will the Range change? Mar 21 08:54 DFL's Marty in charge of environment Mar 21 11:45 OLA report, DFL & Meyer Associates Mar 23 12:48 Liberals' definition of moderate Mar 23 14:37 DFL activists: Government is racist Mar 24 08:59 IRRRB: Revamping vs. scrapping Prior Months: Jan Feb Prior Years: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 SCSU's budget cuts? Cuts in Athletics at SCSU - Will it Really Save Money? by Silence Dogood With a $6,000,000 "structural deficit" and the need to "rebuild reserves by at least $3 million," SCSU has a $9,000,000 hole in its' FY17 budget. It doesn't take a Noble Prize in economics to figure out that reductions in expenditures (i.e., cuts) are going to be made at SCSU. On the Wednesday before Spring Break, SCSU President Dr. Earl H. Potter sent an email to the campus community announcing cuts to the athlet
Read more

January 19-20, 2012

Image
Jan 19 02:57 Minnesota Majority report an indictment against Minnesota's election integrity Jan 19 03:41 Ron Paul's Logic Jan 19 08:08 Newt thrives despite Mitt's hatchet job efforts Jan 19 09:19 Potential Game-Changer: Perry dropping out this am Jan 20 05:12 Newt takes Sen. Santorum to proverbial woodshed Jan 20 00:56 ABC, CNN, crawl into bed with National Enquirer Jan 20 04:00 Child Care small businesses file federal lawsuit Jan 20 04:41 Mitt's biggest policy blunder Jan 20 18:58 Gingrich, Reagan re-united Prior Years: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Newt takes Sen. Santorum to proverbial woodshed Rick Santorum was really feeling it Thursday night. Then he said something that's certain to cause him pain this morning. Here's what he said that got him in trouble: SANTORUM: But you also have to admit that this freshman congressman who wasn't supposed to win a race came and did something you never did, which is blew the li
Read more

October 31, 2007

Oct 31 01:01 Media Matter's Alter Ego? Oct 31 03:32 Iraqi Civilian Casualties Dropping Oct 31 10:52 Hillary's Panderfest Blows Up in Her Face Oct 31 13:15 Brod, Emmer Call For Investigation of Mark Ritchie Oct 31 19:43 Ritchie's 'Episode' a Tempest in a Teapot? Prior Months: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Prior Years: 2006 Media Matter's Alter Ego? One Media Matters-like organization is already too many. It appears as though there's another liberal apologist blog out there. Their name is News Hounds . The post that caught my attention dealt with last weekend's interview of Justin and Darryl Sharraltt on Hannity's America. To say that their post didn't attempt to refute Justin's story is understatement. In fact, they jump right into criticizing Mr. Hannity: Last night's (October 27th) Hannity's America was a strange magazine format which combined stories about mediums and haunted houses
Read more